jan damborsky wrote: > Hi Sundar, > > could I please ask you to review changes for > following bug ? > > 683 orchestrator should be libspmi* clean > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=683 > > Webrev is available at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dambi/bug-683/ > > If anybody else would like to take a look, > it will be appreciated. >
usr/src/lib/liborchestrator/upgrade_targets.c Why not just get rid of om_is_upgrade_target_valid()? There's only a couple of calls to it. Or are we expecting to put in a new implementation later? usr/src/lib/libtd/Makefile I'm assuming there's another bug coming to make TD independent of libspmi? Dave
