Ok.. I noticed there were formatting changes :-). I think we can do the PEP8 compliance stuff later.
thanks, sarah **** Clay Baenziger wrote: > Hi Sarah, > > Strangely, the other way around. This is just a straight revert so > de-PEP8'ifying, as these changes were done during a Tuesday meeting > showing how to PEP8'ify code. I've not made changes from what the gate > had before, so no testing has been done, and thus I don't want to risk > implementing the PEP8 changes for this gatekeeping action. > > Thank you, > Clay > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Sarah Jelinek wrote: > >> Hi Clay, >> >> Looks ok to me. It looks like you did some PEP8 cleanup as well? Just >> checking. >> >> thanks, >> sarah >> ***** >> >> Clay Baenziger wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> It appears my change to the .hgtags file slurped in two example >>> changes in my workspace back in revision 617 of the gate. Luckily, >>> these changes were NOT integrated into build 125. I've reverted the >>> changes and figure since I was the cause someone else should verify I >>> didn't munge things again. My apologies to all gatelings. >>> >>> Webrev: >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/11933/ >>> Bug: >>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11933 >>
