Hi Bruce,
Yes please still send the information, as I suspect we will see
evidence of this being bug
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6182.
Thank you,
Clay
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Bruce Rothermal wrote:
> The install server has 2 interfaces only one is connected to a network.
> Because of some other software installed on the system both interfaces have
> been plumb'd and given an address, but only the one is being used. Could the
> 2 interfaces be causing installadm to be getting messed up.
>
> The connected interface is set to 10.134.1.3 255.255.224.0 static
> The other interface was set to 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 static
>
> Do you still want the output from the ifconfig and dhcpinfo commands
>
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Clay Baenziger wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>> My apologies, perhaps Joe's suggestion is more likely to be what you
>> are hitting. Is your install server multihomed?
>> Thank you,
>> Clay
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Clay Baenziger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bruce,
>>> I wonder if this could be an interaction of not using NWAM during the
>>> automated install versus using NWAM after the install. Could you please
>>> determine the interface in use on the machine during the AI install (using
>>> ifconfig -a |grep DHCP) and tell us the subnet provided by the DHCP server
>>> via dhcpinfo -i iwk0 subnet. Then please tell us the same information
>>> after the machine has been installed?
>>> Thank you,
>>> Clay
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Bruce Rothermal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone seen a problem with installadm installer with subnetted
>>>> addresses.
>>>> We set up installadm on a class A network 10.134.0.0 but subnet net it
>>>> with fffffe00. On the initial boot and load install proceeds correctly
>>>> but after the reboot everything goes wrong. Installed node netmask is not
>>>> set correctly so communication is broken.
>>>> Thanks for you help.
>>>
>
