Dave Miner wrote: > > Agreed. The implementation you see right now is quite some ways from > the intended final form; the current version leveraged what we had to > get something available in OpenSolaris, but isn't providing an > architecture for the long term.
Dave, As someone who's been thrashing like hell to get the installadm test suite put back into the STC gate, this email sounds worrying. Will the changes being considered significantly alter or replace user interfaces, user actions (e.g. how clients are booted and how the user knows when the install is complete), and/or the various things we currently look at to make sure that services have been configured properly (tftp, dhcp, etc.)? If the answer is "yes", then it's probably time to have a discussion on whether further effort on the current AI suites is a good investment of QE's slim resources. Regards, Andre
