On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Ethan Quach<ethan.quach at sun.com> wrote:
>
>
> Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>
>> root at opensolaris:~# installadm create-service -n osol -i 192.168.0.100
>> -c 5 -s /ai/osol-1002-118-ai-x86.iso /ai/osol-1002-118-ai-x86
>> Warning: NWAM is enabled. ?Please be sure that the IP address for
>> opensolaris is static.
>> The netmask obtained from netmasks(4) for network 192.168.0.85 does not
>> equal
>> that network interface's configured netmask.
>> The netmask obtained from netmasks(4) for network 192.168.0.85 does not
>> equal
>> that network interface's configured netmask.
>> Automated Installations will not work with the current server network
>> setup.
>> Please check server network settings and try again.
>> The installadm SMF service (svc:/system/install/server:default) is
>> being taken offline.
>> The installadm SMF service (svc:/system/install/server:default) is no
>> longer online
>> because the last install service has been disabled or deleted.
>>
>> root at opensolaris:~# cat /etc/release
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? OpenSolaris Development snv_118 X86
>> ? ? ? ? ? Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. ?All Rights Reserved.
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Use is subject to license terms.
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Assembled 06 July 2009
>>
>>
>> root at opensolaris:~# egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/netmasks
>> 192.168.0.85 ? ? 255.255.255.0
>>
>> root at opensolaris:~# cat /etc/hosts
>> [.comments.]
>> ::1 opensolaris opensolaris.local localhost loghost
>> 127.0.0.1 opensolaris.local localhost loghost
>> 192.168.0.85 opensolaris
>>
>> Any idea how to debug it?
>>
>
> This means that the netmask configured on the live interface
> doesn't match what's in the /etc/netmasks file.
>
> What is the output of ifconfig -a?
root at opensolaris:~# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu
8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
e1000g0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu
1500 index 2
inet 192.168.0.85 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 8:0:27:cf:3d:ee
e1000g1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
ether 8:0:27:8b:92:28
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu
8252 index 1
inet6 ::1/128
e1000g0: flags=2004841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fecf:3dee/10
ether 8:0:27:cf:3d:ee
>
>
> -ethan
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
