Hi Jan.

On 01/05/09 08:32, Jan Damborsky wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
>
> Jack Schwartz wrote:
>   
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> I did a little more experimenting...
>>
>> ls only shows the size difference between compressed and uncompressed 
>> files when fiocompress -c (not -cm) is used.  du shows the difference 
>> whether -c or -cm is used.
>>
>> When I run du on the build_data/bootroot and the mounted 
>> sparc.microroot, I see a difference, so compression is being done, at 
>> least on some files.
>>
>> The "file" command doesn't show a difference between compressed or 
>> uncompressed files, unfortunately, so I can't tell if a small file is 
>> compressed or not.  Du reports sizes in 512 or larger units.
>>
>> Regarding the devfsadm issue, it looks like the lock file 
>> (/etc/dev/.devfsadm-dev.lock) is processed as the svc repository.db file 
>> is.  Being that repository.db is a large enough file to see that it is 
>> not being compressed, I conclude that the devfsadm lock file isn't 
>> either.  Based on this, what I have done is working.
>>
>> While it is true that the error I saw earlier dealt with access of the 
>> devfsadm lock file, it was because the root file system is read only.  
>> Not sure how to get around this...
>>     
>
> My guess is that the image you generate contains live-fs-root
> without fix for
> 4230 Bootroot assembly changes for SPARC ai images
>
> The fix makes sure that ramdisk is remounted as read-write for Sparc,
> since the command is slightly different comparing to the one used
> for x86 - the excerpt from fixed live-fs-root script shows:
>
> [...]
>     echo "\rRemounting root read/write" > /dev/msglog
>     ISA_INFO=`/sbin/uname -p`
>     if [ $ISA_INFO = "sparc" ]
>     then
>         # ramdisk is differently labeled in sparc vs x86
>         /sbin/mount -o remount,rw /devices/ramdisk-root:a /
>     else
>         # x86 label
>         /sbin/mount -o remount,rw /devices/ramdisk:a /
>     fi
> [...]
>   
Thanks for responding.

Yes, you are correct.  I verified that I didn't have this change.

    Thanks,
    Jack

>
> Thank you,
> Jan
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/caiman-discuss/attachments/20090105/d474194f/attachment.html>

Reply via email to