Hi Mary,

There shouldn't be any man pages in the root_archive.
I checked the manifest used for building the Live CD, none of the man 
page directories
are included.  When you look at things from /usr in the Live CD's 
desktop, /usr is actually
mounted from the user.zlib archive from the live CD, they are not from 
the boot_archive.

Thanks,

--Karen

mary ding wrote:
> Dave and Jan:
>
>
> I helped Jan to test out the fix with the reduced AI image and it works.
>
> 1. However, I do notice that there are man pages in the microroot and 
> they do
> occupy
>   some spaces.  The  man command is not even available in the microroot, 
> can these man packages be removed in the AI microroot:
>
> root at opensolaris:/usr# more /tmp/man
> ./gnu/share/man
> ./has/man
> ./sfw/man
> ./sfw/share/man
> ./share/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/gnu/share/man
> 235K    /usr/gnu/share/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/has/man
> 108K    /usr/has/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/sfw/man
> 512     /usr/sfw/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/sfw/share/man
> 2.8M    /usr/sfw/share/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/share/man
> 6.1M    /usr/share/man
> root at opensolaris:/usr#
>
>
>
> 2.  For Live CD, the man pages also occupy some space and should they be 
> removed also ???  In fact, just /usr/share/man alone had already occupy 
> 56 MB and this will definitely help the low memory 512 MB
> system doing livecd install.
>
> jack at opensolaris:~# cd /usr
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# find . -name man -depth -print > /tmp/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# more /tmp/man
> ./X11/man
> ./X11/share/man
> ./bin/man
> ./gnu/share/man
> ./has/man
> ./man
> ./perl5/5.8.4/man
> ./perl5/man
> ./sfw/man
> ./sfw/share/man
> ./share/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr#
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/X11/share/man
>   5.6M   /usr/X11/share/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/gnu/share/man
>   247K   /usr/gnu/share/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/has/man
>   114K   /usr/has/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/perl5/5.8.4/man
>    10M   /usr/perl5/5.8.4/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/sfw/share/man
>   2.2M   /usr/sfw/share/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr# du -skh /usr/share/man
>    56M   /usr/share/man
> jack at opensolaris:/usr#
>
>
>
> Dave Miner wrote:
>   
>> jan damborsky wrote:
>>     
>>> Dave Miner wrote:
>>>       
>>>> As Jan mentioned at the meeting earlier today, I'd built a test image 
>>>> which takes advantage of the package split I integrated under bug 
>>>> 5468.   Unhappy with the fact that the image didn't get any smaller as 
>>>> a result, I spent the afternoon before the break doing surgery on the 
>>>> package list for the AI image and managed to reduce its size by 45%. 
>>>> Jan indicates that the resulting image does in fact install, so I 
>>>> didn't completely blow it ;-)
>>>>         
>>> Yes, it seems that all necessary pieces are still there :-)
>>> I have also tried to install on machine with 1GB memory
>>> without swap and the installation was successful.
>>> (it fails with standard AI image - the problem is tracked by 4166).
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Below are my diffs for ai_x86_image.xml for one of you on the AI team 
>>>> to pick up and integrate at your leisure.  You'll need a repository 
>>>> created with the fix for 5657 in order to take advantage of it.
>>>>         
>>> Since reduced AI image resolves problem described in 4166, if you agree
>>> I would take those changes and integrate them as fix for that bug.
>>>
>>>       
>> Sure, please do.
>>
>> Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>   


Reply via email to