On 01/11/10 08:30 PM, Sarah Jelinek wrote: > Hi Sundar, > > Thank you so much for taking the time to review this. My comments inline.. > > >> Sarah, ... > >> Page 32: >> - I don't think that the server side (installadm) fits in to the >> architecture. Since we have plans to run the server side setup on >> systems running different operating systems, We need to have a different >> design to fit those needs. > > This is a good point. I think for Solaris it fits into the architecture. > But, if we are going to support multiple OS's on the server we need to > rethink this to ensure it is portable. >
We don't currently have plans to support the server side on non-Solaris operating systems. Were we to do so we'd have to evaluate, but the intention here is that most, if not all, of the functionality required will be relatively portable. However, the proposed design for service and image management should be quite compatible with using this architecture for managing the service images. Dave
