* jeanm (Jean.McCormack at Sun.COM) wrote: > Glenn Lagasse wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >So, DC currently considers the first step/checkpoint run as part of a > >construction process as step number 0. Was this intentional? I ask > >because now that the im-pop phase is a finalizer script and not baked > >into DC proper, I'm wondering if numbering should start with 1 instead > >of 0 (I realize most people just use the names in which case the issue > >is moot). > > > Added a level of complexity to make it step 1 and since people are > encouraged to use names and not numbers there didn't seem to be any > point.
Ah ok. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't because im-pop was performed 'inside' DC proper instead of via the finalizer (like it is now). Thanks Jean! -- Glenn
