Thanks for the response Dave.

I've looked at opensolaris.com and it's much more like what I would expect.

Sorry if I caused any confusion.

Joe


Dave Miner wrote:
> Joseph J VLcek wrote:
>> I would like to share my experience downloading OpenSolaris, Ubuntu 
>> and Fedora.
>>
>> Recently a group of us evaluated Linux live media installs. In 
>> downloading Ubuntu and Fedora it seemed to me that their websites were 
>> more concise and targeted at users that wanted to download the Live 
>> Media to install on a desktop.
>>
>> In contrast the opensolaris page seems to have a lot more information, 
>> that seems to be, less valuable to the desktop user who simply wants 
>> to download OpenSolaris Live Media.
>>
>> Ubuntu and Fedora both have an easy to find big icon to "Begin 
>> Download" or "Download Now".
>>
>> There is a checksum for a global image on the Opensolaris download 
>> page but if one does a text search of the page for "global" a 
>> description of what the "global" image is for is not easily evident.
>>
>> More sophisticated users and those that want to contribute are more 
>> likely to be willing to drill down into the OpenSolaris web site. 
>> However those that may want to simply download and try OpenSolaris on 
>> there desktop may not be.
>>
>> I think it might be valuable to evaluate having the OpenSolaris page 
>> focus on the desktop user that wants to download and install OSOL. 
>> Having a "Download" buttom on the www.opensolaris.org page might help. 
>> The small "Download" disk icon at the top may not be obvious to some.
>>
>> These are just my thoughts from my experiences attempting to view this 
>> as a new user.
>>
>> I realize a lot of thought went into the OpenSolaris site and I 
>> appreciate that. I only share these thought in an attempt to help 
>> improve the user experience.
>>
> 
> I think your feedback is important and useful, but I would point out 
> that opensolaris.com is the primary outlet for the distribution, not 
> opensolaris.org.  I think its design (while imperfect to be sure) is 
> somewhat more oriented at the end-users that we're trying to reach.
> 
> Dave


Reply via email to