Hi Glenn,

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Glenn Lagasse wrote:

> Hi Sue (and team),
>
> * Susan Sohn (Susan.Sohn at Sun.COM) wrote:
>> The incremental webrev for the text installer project has been posted at:
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kemitche/text_v3_incremental/
>>
>> This webrev shows the diffs from the original code review with certain
>> exceptions as described in the NOTE below.
>>
>> The full webrev to date is located at:
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~kemitche/text_v3/
>>
>> We would like to get feedback on this round of changes no later than COB
>> Tuesday, 2/9, if at all possible.  If you would like to review these changes 
>> but
>> can't be done with your comments by then please contact me and we'll work
>> something out.
>
> I reviewed the same file set as I had previously.  Only a couple of
> questions.
>
> usr/src/cmd/distro_const/text_install/text_mode_sparc.xml:
>
> Why are we including gcc-dev in the initial package list?
>
> usr/src/cmd/distro_const/text_install/text_mode_x86.xml:
>
> Why are we including gdb in the initial package list?  And why isn't it
> in the sparc package list (Does gdb not run on sparc)?
> Why are we including gcc-dev in the initial package list?

gcc was requested by marketing in the initial package
list (as was gdb). That said, both of these packages
along with a number of others will be removed as part
of -

14071 text install package list needs to be trimmed down

I'll be putting out a code review for that to the list
real soon now.

Thanks for the review!
Alok

Reply via email to