On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:57 +0100, Jan Damborsky wrote: > Hi Alex, > > looking at this bug and fixed related issues, I agree we could now > get rid of dcfs assuming that we can sacrifice free space in ramdisk > we are going to lose (~ 25MB): > > [1] We need to make sure that there are no issues with > respect to 'supposed to work' configurations. > > Currently, installers (AI/text) are supposed to work on Sparc > machines with 512MB of memory. > > I don't assume that fix for 6361 itself would cause problems, > since it does not change the size of ramdisk, but we should check > that we can still install on those machines with latest bits > in order to confirm we can afford losing those ~25MB which > (if needed) could be used to decrease size of ramdisk. > > I think Mary has access to machines which we could use for testing - > we could help you with this. > > [2] We should check with DDU project which could introduce potential > consumers of ramdisk space. > > Jack, do you happen to know how DDU might affect size boot archive > and free space in ramdisk ? > > Thank you, > Jan
Thanks Jan, agree, so waiting answer from Jack and it's would be fine if Mary could test boot_archive without dcfs on 512MB. -- ::alhazred
