Hi Sue,

Looks fine to me.

Alok

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Susan Sohn wrote:

> After further investigation, it was determined that errno was not being set
> correctly due to the lack of a -mt option when building libti. I have updated
> the webrev, taking into account the changes made by 14734. No changes have 
> been
> made to instantiate.c since the last webrev.
>
> Updated webrev is at:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sohn/14295c
>
> If the original reviewers (cc'd) could check the updated webrev, that would 
> be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
>
> On 02/18/10 12:20 PM, sanjay nadkarni wrote:
>> 
>> Sue and I have had an ongoing discussion about this code review. The
>> code addresses handling GPT labeled disks on sparc systems .
>> 
>> The problem is that change as made is hiding a bizzare ioctl/errno
>> behavior. It is unclear if this is systemic issue for TI or ON or
>> specific to the text installer. A scan of ON src revealed that the cut'n
>> paste code has gone viral in ON and could also be potentially hiding
>> elsewhere too.
>> 
>> I am recommending that for now, this bugfix should be tabled and that
>> the team should be allowed to push the changes into slim_source with
>> this bug open. Until the problem is completely understood and it would
>> okay to document the work around for sparc.
>> 
>> 
>> -Sanjay
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 02/15/10 03:22 PM, Susan Sohn wrote:
>>> I'd like to get a review of my changes for:
>>> 
>>> 14295 GPT labeled disks don't show up on SPARC with fix to bug 14144
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
>>> 
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sohn/14295/
>>> 
>>> These changes implement the second part of the bug fix, to provide a
>>> warning
>>> popup to the user and to fix libti to recognize the GPT disk so that
>>> an SMI
>>> label can be applied.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sue
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>> 
>
>

Reply via email to