On 03/30/10 10:38 AM, Sarah Jelinek wrote: > Hi Alex, > >>> >> TD has no problems with this EFI disk (c0t0d0), for example test_td >> output: >> Disk discovery >> Total number of disks: 4 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> num | name| vendor| ctype| mtype| rem| lbl| bsize|#of blocks|size >> [MB]| volname| >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> 1 |* c0t2d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| V| 512| 143374738| 70007| - | >> 2 | c0t3d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| V| 512| 143374738| 70007| - | >> 3 | c0t0d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| G| 512| 143374738| 70007| - | >> 4 | c0t1d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| V| 512| 143374738| 70007| - | >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > Interesting.. so does liborchestrator actually look for a label and > ignore the disk if it can't find one?
I wonder, is this related to: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15294 6937739 DM_NHEADS and DM_NSECTORS not available for disks w/o VTOC starting build 135 ? -Shawn
