I agree that we should have caught this before pushing but I think we were all too busy drinking in the hotel lobby bar (this was pushed during work-week).

Thanks for the quick review!

-Drew

On 7/8/11 2:42 PM, Jesse Butler wrote:

I'm guessing whomever integrated the change that caused this didn't run the tests prior to pushing? We really should put the "run tests per integration" requirement on this side of the push, rather than once the changeset is integrated.

Anyhow, looks good.

/jb

On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Drew Fisher wrote:

Good afternoon!

Could I please get a quick code review for:

7044109 <http://monaco.us.oracle.com/detail.jsf?cr=7044109> New slim_unit_test failures after TI_CUD putback

https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/caiman/drewfish/7044109/webrev/

Naturally, the tests run clean now and are also pep8 clean.

-Drew
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to