I have looked at the code changes and tested the generated package.
Other than the issue that we talked about, which is the fact that the
osnet-incorporation manifest license specification has
'must-accept=true' and this doesn't the changes look good. As long as
Bonnie and David Comay are okay with this then I don't see a problem.
Harold
On 09/22/11 14:34, Sue Sohn wrote:
Can I get a couple of reviews of the changes for:
7093245 package install-image/solaris-auto-install has no license
Webrev:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/caiman/sohn/7093245/webrev.7093245
Testing:
The install-image/solaris-auto-install package manifest built with
these changes shows:
license <hash> chash=<hash2> license=lic_OTN must-accept=true
pkg.csize=4674 pkg.size=11984
I have successfully created a service with the package. Once the
service is created, I can see the
license with:
pkg -R <imagedir> info --license.
I have also created a user image and attempted to install the package
into it and was prompted to
accept the license:
pkg: The following packages require their licenses to be accepted
before they can be installed or
updated:
----------------------------------------
Package:
pkg://ai-image/install-image/[email protected],5.11-0.173.0.0.0.0.1376:20110922T192557Z
License: lic_OTN
License requires acceptance.
To indicate that you agree to and accept the terms of the licenses of
the packages listed above, use
the --accept option. To display all of the related licenses, use the
--licenses option.
Thanks,
Sue
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
