Ok. Thanks Jan. I'll add that comment in.
ginnie
On 11/10/11 12:22 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
Hi Ginnie,
in that case, I may recommend to add comment section
capturing outcome of what you and Sean had discussed:
* clarifying effect of setting SVCCFG_CHECKHASH
* why that's needed - i.e. that it is workaround for 6370885 and could
be removed once that CR is fixed.
Thank you,
Jan
On 11/09/11 17:11, Virginia Wray wrote:
Hi Jan --
Thank you for taking a look at this. I consulted with Sean on this
bug. He helped me track down the source of the problem, and this was
his suggested fix.
There is a CR, 6370885, that, if it is implemented, will enable us to
remove this.
thanks,
ginnie
On 11/ 9/11 03:31 AM, Jan Damborsky wrote:
Hi Ginnie,
if I understand the underlying problem correctly, it is caused by
the fact
that 'svccfg apply' does not store hashes for profiles applied.
Thus, if such
profile is then later removed, manifest import does not recognize
that and
doesn't remove related configuration from site-profile layer unless
there is another change in site profiles which has its has recorded
in smf.
If my understanding is correct, then I am wondering if this behavior
is intentional
or if it's a bug, as such behavior is apparently confusing.
Pulling Sean into the loop who may shed more light on this aspect.
Thank you,
Jan
On 11/08/11 15:35, Virginia Wray wrote:
Hi All --
Could I get a review for the following CR:
http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=7105569
Webrev is located at:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/caiman/ginnie/7105569/webrev/
Seb -- if Sean Wilcox didn't satisfactorily answer your question in
the affiliated bug, please let me know.
Thanks,
ginnie
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
