On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Ethan Quach wrote:

> 
> 
> On 03/15/12 09:25, Dave Miner wrote:
>> On 03/14/12 22:33, Jesse Butler wrote:
>> ...
>>> Proposed solution
>>> 
>>> The actions which will cause a local DHCP configuration to be
>>> automatically updated are 'create-service', 'delete-service',
>>> 'create-client' and 'delete-client'. Rather than add a new switch to
>>> each of these commands, I'd prefer to add a single boolean SMF
>>> property to the AI service, 'manage-dhcp' or similar. The '-i' and
>>> '-c' options will behave as they are currently do for
>>> 'create-service', but will issue a warning if 'manage-dhcp' is not
>>> set to true. For all implicit automated configuration changes, if the
>>> property is true, we will behave as we currently do. If set to false,
>>> then we'll not attempt to update the configuration at all.
>>> 
>>> I believe that this value should default to false, so that default
>>> behavior out of the box is to not alter any configuration unless
>>> requested to do so.
> 
> Jesse, I thought we wanted the default value to be True so that things would 
> be consistent with default behavior shipped with S11 FCS.  Also, update to 
> later releases won't require action to turn things back to how things behaved 
> before the update.

We could do that. I think it's best to default to a non-destructive 
functionality... but, if maintaining the current behavior is required, we can 
certainly default it to True.

Is there a reason behind maintaining the same behavior, other than 
compatibility?

Jesse

> 
>> 
>> Is there evidence to support that the majority of the cases where DHCP 
>> configurations might be manipulated are ones that installadm should not be 
>> updating?  We generally make defaults conform to the expected common case.
> 
> Other than the bugs filed, I don't think we have any more data to tell us 
> either way.

> 
> 
> -ethan
> 
>> 
>> Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to