Okay, you win. But I don't think it really helps Tony fix the problem that started this thread. It's not a PHP 4 vs. PHP 5 issue, no matter how many words you devote to telling me that PHP 5 is true objected-oriented programming. It's a style issue, and if Tony needs to mix functional programming with object-oriented programming, who am I to tell him what to do?
Obviously we can't expect Tony to sit around and wait for Cake 2.0... On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not TRUE object oriented programming. That is the whole revelation of > PHP5 and why most frameworks aren't available to PHP4. Sure it has it > by being VERY careful in what you are doing. But it still is > cumbersome, prone to errors, and slow as compared to PHP5. Which > again, is why most frameworks cheap out to PHP5 only and aren't as > ingenous as the CakePHP people to tackle the PHP4 challenge. > > So, yes it does support OO programming. It just doesn't do it well and > in the truest since of the term. But again having to tackle having one > method that automatically references PHP4 or PHP5 correctly is one > distinction of CakePHP. > > > > > -- Chris Hartjes "The greatest inefficiencies come from solving problems you will never have." -- Rasmus Lerdorf @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
