Yes, using version control is a solution, just as saving and replacing some files, but I don't like this solution, because it requires a manual intervention.
What do you mean by "nothing will get done" ? That "it's working the way it's meant to work", or that "nobody will take care of it" ? I can submit a patch if it's what you are pointing out. I'm just looking for some insight about how it's supposed to work. Currently, I can't see why the extract process has an option "--extract-core". Why would someone want to ignore the core messages ? And why extracting the core messages is exclusive to extracting the validation messages ? Does someone knows why it has been desined this way ? Le vendredi 7 décembre 2012 23:58:24 UTC+1, cricket a écrit : > > The only thing you can be sure of is that nothing will get done. Just > make a copy of your Locale directory. Better yet: use version control. > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Cyrille Faucheux > <cyrille....@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > Because the extracting process overwrite all the files. > > I probably could do it manually, by backuping and replacing some files, > but > > I don't want to since I'm sure it will lead to mistakes. > > > > Le jeudi 6 décembre 2012 17:07:09 UTC+1, euromark a écrit : > >> > >> why not running it twice? once for the core and once for the app? > >> > >> > >> Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 09:24:25 UTC+1 schrieb Cyrille > Faucheux: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> I'm trying to internationalize an application, and I face some > problems > >>> with the I18N shell when extracting messages. > >>> > >>> When I run the extract task (cake.bat i18n extract), I'm asked whether > I > >>> want to extract messages from the Cake core, which is what I want > since > >>> there is some important messages to translate in the core (for > example, the > >>> names of the months, in the Form helper). > >>> > >>> But when the extraction of core messages is enabled, the extraction of > >>> validation messages from the models is disabled. Of course, I want > both... > >>> > >>> I can see some logic behind that, for example, having the translations > of > >>> the core for one version of Cake which can be shared among several > >>> applications, but this is not the case. > >>> > >>> Does someone know why this is working this way, if this is a bug or a > >>> feature I'm not using properly ? > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance. > >>> > >>> Cyrille > > > > -- > > Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP > > Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "CakePHP" group. > > To post to this group, send email to cake...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > cake-php+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. > > > > > -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
