At last you can use Cake in the way you like it. For instance you could use only the dispatcher and controller functions and work the DB communications and view generation your own way (even using other tools).
Just my thoughts. -- Pablo Viojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pviojo.net On 1/9/07, Veloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That sounds good to me too > > I've had the unusual luxury, due to a lull in office work, to compare > several php frameworks, side by side and pretty in-depth. Ultimately it > came down to Zend and to Cake. > > Honestly our group would have chosen Zend over Cake if Zend had been a > little further along in its development. Cake is a wonderfully crafted > tool, but all of us are seasoned developers who could be categorized as > "once bitten, twice shy" when it comes to software solutions that try > too hard to "help you" :-) or that appear to be headed that way in the > future.. > > We were drawn to Zend's transparency - you have to write more code (at > least for the bootstrap) than you do in Cake, but what you see is > pretty much what you get - there's very little that happens in the > framework that you don't specifically ask for in your code. This is > not to say that it's not powerful, it's to say that the "car won't > move unless you turn the key and put it into gear" lol. > > Anyway, I would love to share with a dev discussion list what I think > are the strengths of both products for the purpose of possibly > improving Cake. > > Michael > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
