Hi AD7six I can see that my previous post wasn't clear :-) I get the following performance:
No cache, no requestAction: 6 seconds Cache, no requestAction: 1 second Cache, with requestAction: 3 seconds The action called by requestAction is pretty light weight, so while it steals about half the benefit of the caching it is still a bit improvement. It also allows me to dump a bunch of stuff out of appController, so all of the admin pages are benefiting as well. Regards, Langdon > You might want to compare: > > Not using cache and not using requestAction > with > Not using cache and using (1) requestAction > with > Using cache and using (1) requestAction > with > Using cache and not using requestAction > > I would bet you get (approximately) 1:1.5:1:0.2. I.e. using > requestAction within a cached file pretty much defeats the purpose. > > Obviously that is quite dependent on what the main page controller is > doing. > >> I am starting to get a feel for how to use view caching and >> <cake:nocache>. It really requires (for complex pages) that you plan in >> the view caching from the start. > > Indeed :) > > HTH, > > AD7six --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
