Hi Nate, this is interesting - could you write somthing more about it ? (a post ;) ? ) Maybe some example ? What are the conventions for such datasources etc? Up until now - people just used $useTable = false and put all the logic in the model. greets, Marcin Domanski
On Feb 7, 3:46 am, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I definitely wasn't agreeing with you, but I wasn't really making fun > of you either. I'll give you a hint: there's a reason why we have a > base DataSource class, which is extended by DboSource, which talks to > the database on behalf of a model. Felix's Google Analytics model is > actually a pretty poor example. Not because Felix is a bad coder or > anything (quite the contrary), but because up till now, there are a > few things that people really haven't clearly understood (or perhaps, > there are a few things we haven't made clear for people). Basically > what I'm trying to say is that you should never have to extend Model > in that way. Models are designed to *model* data, not handle the > details of accessing it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
