> However, I highly doubt that YUI is more efficient at selector > based DOM manipulation as jQuery is. And even more I doubt that the > jQuery devs have said this. There was some talk about benchmarking the > selector engines of various libraries and maybe Slocum's implementation > is a little faster right now. However it doesn't support as many > selectors as jQuery does and most importantly doesn't come with the > elegant DOM manipulation functionality wrapped around the result set.
Just FYI, and so no one thinks I'm just making up benchmarks: "Today, Jack Slocum announced his new DOMQuery selector library. In short: The bar has been raised. His library is very very fast. Quite possibly the fastest available today." http://jquery.com/blog/2007/01/11/selector-speeds/ And as mentioned at the top of that post, all their issues with the YUI extensions were resolved, and it still vastly outperformed JQuery (see http://www.jackslocum.com/blog/2007/01/12/domquery-in-response-to- jquerys-response/ ) As for if the other features of JQuery compensate, I'm not qualified to say. Woody --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
