To improve session performance, you may try Sharedance: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/ instead of Memcached. Sharedance requires less memory than the counterpart. MCache ( http://www.mohawksoft.org/?q=node/8) is also a good choice too.
pcdinh On 6/8/07, Joshua Benner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chris Hartjes wrote: > > On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the info. > >> My assumption (unfounded apparently) was that accessing data in the > >> session > >> when stored in the database would require round trips to the database > >> which is slower than accessing the local disk. > >> > >> Thanks again, I'll give database storage a try. > >> > > > > Well, on a single box I think file access is faster than database, but > > if you have multiple application servers then you'll need to use a > > centralized database or centralized memcached setup. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > > > > > Yes, file access on single box is faster. Database session can also be > useful if you've got multiple architectures in a single app needing > access to session data. > > > > -- Nobody in nowhere --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
