Here are some of my validation rules, in case this helps any... btw, in the view, I use $form->input of course, which displays validation messages if any A note to keep in mind, this works great for user registration, but I haven't build a method for editing users yet. the 'validateUnique' rules might need to be tested/inspected to make sure it works for editing existing entries
var $validate = array( 'username' => array( 'length' => array( 'rule' => array('between', 6, 40), 'message' => 'Your username must have between 6 and 40 characters'), 'unique' => array( 'rule' => array('validateUnique', 'username'), 'message' => 'The username you entered already exists' ), ), 'password' => array( 'length' => array( 'rule' => array('between', 6, 40), 'message' => 'Your password must have between 6 and 40 characters'), ), 'email' => array( 'length' => array( 'rule' => array('between', 1, 255), 'message' => 'Your email must have between 1 and 255 characters'), 'unique' => array( 'rule' => array('validateUnique', 'email'), 'message' => 'The email address you entered already exists' ), 'format' => array( 'rule' => 'email', 'message' => 'The email address you provided is not valid'), ), 'first_name' => array( 'length' => array( 'rule' => array('between', 1, 64), 'message' => 'Your first name must have between 1 and 64 characters'), ), 'last_name' => array( 'length' => array( 'rule' => array('between', 1, 64), 'message' => 'Your last name must have between 1 and 64 characters'), ), ); On 6/28/07, Howard Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6/28/07, francky06l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am working on validation in 1.2 and I discovered some "strange" > > behaviors. > > > > > I would really like for someone to post their "real world" working > 1.2validation > model using a varied mix of the capabilities. I've read most of the docs > but > still don't have a clear picture. I'm sure an actual example would be > useful, > and I would hazard a guess most of us could work out what we need to know > from that and better exploit the feature. I'm sure I can do better than > valid_not_empty :-) > > HG > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---