I think I agree with your point too!

I'm beginning to feel that I'm going to be a better baker from today.
Thanks for your 2 cents and on how you guys would debug your
programmes.

On Dec 29, 6:33 pm, AD7six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:01 pm, ProFire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yup!!!
> > I believe that's a very good way to validate existing fields and
> > output errors for it.
>
> > What about the non-existing fields?
>
> > Example:
> > Password: <input>abc
> > Verify Password: <input>abc
>
> > Personally, I would feel that a notice like "account/verify_password
> > was not inserted because field don't exist in table `account`" would
> > be very very useful.
>
> I think that would very quickly get annoying. you can add validation
> rules for virtual fields, and if the cause is a misspelling, when you
> debug you'd spot that ;). I don't see the benefit in adding logic
> which would always be executed to cater for a development only
> problem.
>
> > Anybody have a way to output such messages automatically?
>
> If you want that, use beforeValidate to add an error message for
> everything in $this->data that isn't what you are expecting.
>
> hth,
>
> AD
> PS. Emphasis on the "debug".
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to