I with Villa. Im no cake Guru, but I would love to provide support, and reviewing bakery submissions seems like a task I could handle.
On Jul 14, 7:09 pm, villas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes sir, I would volunteer! To be honest, I would put myself in the > bottom quartile of Cake skillfullness, but I reckon I still know > enough to spot abuse and give a timely "thumbs up" to a well-written > article. > > I would propose a simple posting to this group would produce many > excellent candidates for such a job and I believe the Cake team would > have no problem choosing the best. Put us to the test -- collectively > we could have decent Bakery articles approved in hours not weeks! > > On Jul 14, 8:01 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:55 PM, villas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That's such a pity if the Bakery wouldn't be supported for such an > > > avoidable reason. Surely the Cake team can just increase the number of > > > trusted Bakery administrators so that there is always someone on > > > 'duty'. Why not have 20 reviewers, or more? It seems so strange in > > > such an active and knowledgeable community to take 2 weeks to approve > > > something. > > > Does that mean you're volunteering? > > > -- > > Chris Hartjes > > Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..." > > @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
