I believe that CakePHP can handle big/huge websites, but using the Mozilla Add-ons as an example is not a trully example. Why? Mozilla add-ons uses a very modified version of Cake 1.1, if you dont believe me, check app_model of it. Also, I think it uses Zend too. So, there HAS to be a better example than that.
Cheers, mbavio On Sep 21, 9:19 pm, Nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://book.cakephp.org/view/510/Sites-in-the-wild > > Take special note of the Mozilla Add-ons portal, one of the most > heavily trafficked in the world. > > On Sep 21, 2:35 am, toby78 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am currently evaluating different frameworks and also looking at > > cakePHP. > > > My first thought was that it seems not very efficient... > > > If you have an object, e.g. "User" that has other related objects such > > as "Message" or "Photo" - there will be SQL statements to select all > > content from all related tabled - no matter whether it is used or not. > > > If you have a large database table this could also lead to problems as > > the query is not pages, but everything is selected at once? > > > There also does not seem to be a caching of database queries? > > > Or is this possible? And if so, how do you define which queries are > > cached in which intervall? > > > Thanks! > > > Toby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
