I think the book is on the right way. Think a half year back! Nearly nothing was documented.
Now, evertime I search a feature I look at the proper sections of the book. If you need help about Formhelper, look at the Built-In Helpers chapter. It is structured very well, and you find many things without searching for it. On Oct 2, 6:17 pm, mbavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe next time you can ask if the functionality is broken first, and > avoid kabturek a headache :) > > Cheers. > mbavio > > On Oct 2, 9:31 am, leberle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ohps....that explains it...thx for the info :) > > > On Oct 2, 2:15 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The search feature in the book is broken and under > > > repair:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/18c4e419... > > > > On Oct 2, 11:48 am, leberle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Well, i change my whining to "the book-search should be optimized"... > > > > searching for "input" or "inputs" shows no results, as does > > > > "formhelper"... > > > > > And there is no reason to be sad Marcin, we both got what we > > > > expected...you expected trolling, i expected critic-resistant fans who > > > > take critic as trolling, so everything is fine :) > > > > > I do my contribution to cake in #cakephp > > > > > >>There where many of your kind here before and they just wrote the same > > > > > ...dude, you REALLY should think about this sentence...all i said was, > > > > that i think that melting API and Docs together would be very helpfull > > > > as it is often hard to find infos about features. But if you prefer to > > > > be mister documentation-is-perfect-only-idiots-dont-find-what-they-are- > > > > looking-for, then farewell dude... > > > > > On Oct 2, 11:17 am, "Marcin Domanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > im ashamed im always so easily provoked by trolls :) > > > > > -- > > > > > Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Marcin Domanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > You expect right - what is complaining without helping ? useless > > > > > > whining... > > > > > > here is your label > > > > > > :http://book.cakephp.org/view/189/Automagic-Form-Elements > > > > > > Let me ask you this - when you learned about something that isnt > > > > > > documented - did you update the book.cakephp.org with your findings > > > > > > ? > > > > > > Don't expect much if you don't give anything... > > > > > > There where many of your kind here before and they just wrote the > > > > > > same > > > > > > as you and faded away... (you can search the group if you like) > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Marcin Domanski > > > > > >http://kabturek.info > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, leberle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> Hey dudes, > > > > > > >> I've been playing around with cake for some time now, and i really > > > > > >> like cake, its a brilliant framework. > > > > > >> But Cakes weakness is the documentation. There are so many features > > > > > >> that are not documented yet....this really has to change, > > > > > >> undocumented > > > > > >> features are worthless features. Before cake, i was using > > > > > >> codeigniter. > > > > > >> CI is small, but fast. AND: it is documented. I know about this > > > > > >> "CI is > > > > > >> company driven shit"-talk, but at least you dont have to look in > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> core every time you wanna use a feature. > > > > > > >> Well, as this is a fan-community i expect to get flamed now, but > > > > > >> all i > > > > > >> wanna say is: cake needs better documentation. Melt the API-Refs > > > > > >> and > > > > > >> the Docs together. Devs should not have to look in the core-source > > > > > >> to > > > > > >> find out how features work (e.g.: how to change the fieldset-label > > > > > >> when using the $formHelper->inputs(..) function...what i just did > > > > > >> - u > > > > > >> can pass an association named 'legend' => 'your fieldset title' > > > > > >> along > > > > > >> with the other, not associativ entries...as far as i can see: not > > > > > >> documented..correct me if i'm wrong ) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
