Why not just make it hidden? On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, FranktheTank <frankbirchstu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @CraigFisher: I ended up going readonly too - using the field as > disabled was not quite as intuitive as I was hoping. It wasn't any > harder and selecting it for styling it was easy. > > @mscdex: I was looking for a generic form related attribute. id would > be a better example than width, but there's probably an option in the > options array for setting the id. Perhaps a rel attribute or > something like that - I can't think if rel is allowed in an input tag, > but I think you get the idea. > > Thanks all! > Frank > > > On Feb 18, 4:05 am, CraigFisher <crayfis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I got caught by the phantom data loss: the $data array after POSTing >> doesn't contain the all the fields from the Model->read; only those >> that aren't disabled - so if you fail validation, and theformis >> redisplayed, the data which was originally populated via the Model- >> >> >read will have lost the fields which were disabled. >> >> Readonly and css was the way that I used... otherwise you can't use >> the 'Input' styling for consistent looks & view code. >> >> -C > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
