I assumed the 'required'=>true was obvious, given the parameters mentioned. I should have mentioned that, also.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:27 PM, jstein <jst...@image.dk> wrote: > > On Apr 29, 6:00 pm, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just use a rule (eg. notEmpty) for each of them. You'll get errors for >> whichever fields were not set. > > No, "notEmpty" will fail validation, if the field is present but > empty. It will NOT fail, if the field is not set at all. > > If the field MUST be set, use 'required'=>true (and still use the > notEmpty rule, if empty values should not be allowed). > > See http://book.cakephp.org/view/129/required > > I just learned the difference the hard way... ;-) > > I don't think the case when none of the fields are present can be > handled by validation rules, but starkey has given a solution for > this. > > Regards > > Jonathan > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---