I assumed the 'required'=>true was obvious, given the parameters
mentioned. I should have mentioned that, also.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:27 PM, jstein <jst...@image.dk> wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 6:00 pm, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just use a rule (eg. notEmpty) for each of them. You'll get errors for
>> whichever fields were not set.
>
> No, "notEmpty" will fail validation, if the field is present but
> empty. It will NOT fail, if the field is not set at all.
>
> If the field MUST be set, use 'required'=>true (and still use the
> notEmpty rule, if empty values should not be allowed).
>
> See http://book.cakephp.org/view/129/required
>
> I just learned the difference the hard way... ;-)
>
> I don't think the case when none of the fields are present can be
> handled by validation rules, but starkey has given a solution for
> this.
>
>  Regards
>
>    Jonathan
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to