its easier to extend them if you ever need a custom class Route extends CakeRoute etc would not be possible with "Route" right away
but - in those cases you could then use AppRoute extends Route so in the end it probably doesnt matter :) but since it is part of the core, why not declaring its belonging? Same thing with other frameworks like "Zend_xyz" or whatever well, just my 5 cents tonight On 1 Feb., 22:05, Tilen Majerle <tilen.maje...@gmail.com> wrote: > probably because of copyrights too....who knows... > > -- > Lep pozdrav, Tilen Majerlehttp://majerle.eu > > 2011/2/1 red <mbu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > question of curiosity - why some class names in CakePHP starts with > > Cake* prefix, but majority not? > > > Is the only reason the collision of names with generally used classes > > in PHP (eg. Session => CakeSession or Log => CakeLog)? If yes, why > > there is more like CakeRoute or now in developed CakePHP 2.0 - eg. > > CakeRequest or CakeResponse which would not have a name collision? > > > Regards. > > > -- > > Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials > >http://tv.cakephp.org > > Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://ask.cakephp.organd help > > others with their CakePHP related questions. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<cake-php%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.c > > om>For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -- Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials http://tv.cakephp.org Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
