Rich Brown <richb.hano...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi folks, > > I saw a blog posting that was enthusing about codel/fq_codel, and I was moved > to > respond that the state of the art was now cake.
where? > But I looked at the Cake page on Bufferbloat.net and wonder if everything > there > is true, or whether it would be good to update > it. https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake/ It's pretty much true. > (Once the technical information on that page is current, I would also be > willing > to tackle a modest reorganization to add some background info to the beginning > so that we can cite that page as the primary reference for Cake.) I would really for us to make the effort to upstream this in 2018. I'm still dubious about "cobalt", and I'd like to make the GRO peeling less agressive (again), relative to load, and it needs some cleanups to match current kernels. > > Thanks! > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
