On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Pete Heist <petehe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2017, at 4:29 AM, Dave Taht <d...@taht.net> wrote: > > > *** Round 5 Plans > > * If I do another high RTT test, make rtt 1000ms default and try even higher > > * From Dave: tcp bbr, cdg, reno? dctcp would be weirdly interesting. > > * From Dave: slot 4ms 4ms bytes 10k 16 > > * If I get time I could change flenter to do asymmetric bandwidth tests and > go > back to Dave’s four box config with ingress cake, which would probably be a > more > common config. All depends on time available… > > > Well, let's see what happens on netdev. > > I took a few steps towards ripping out blue for comparison the other > day. > > > Ok, irtt needs shoring up before its first “pre-release release”, likely to > be in mid-December. I’ll focus on that with what time I have (which is less > now until the new year) until more is known. > > I think we can say Cake is stable and helps in many situations over what’s > currently available. There are smaller mysteries in different corners, but > they usually come down to something like: > > - the queue has been lost > - it's configured wrong > - that’s how it should be > - the device or driver isn’t working right > - the device is multi-queue > - the cpu is over-taxed > - the timer resolution isn’t high enough > > Maybe we can make these deployment issues easier for people to deal with > over time, first through documentation, then proposing and implementing > solutions if they become clear. Overall though, I’m glad Cake is available, > because in many situations people can just add a few keywords and enjoy the > benefits…
"sch_cake cookbook" > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
