{Do I need all the lists?}
Sergey Fedorov via Bloat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just a note that I have a plan to separate the loaded latency into
> upload/download. It's not great UX now they way it's implemented.
> The timeline view is a bit more nuanced, in the spirit of the simplistic
> UX, but I've been thinking on a good way to show that for super users as
> well.
> Two latency numbers - that's more user friendly, we want the general user
> to understand the meaning. And latency under load is much easier than
> bufferbloat.
> As a side note, if our backend is decent, I'm curious what are the
backends
> for the speed tests that exist that are great :)
Does it find/use my nearest Netflix cache?
As others asked, it would be great if we could put the settings into a URL,
and having the "latency under upload" is probably the most important number
that people trying to videoconference need to know.
(it's also the thing that they can mostly directly/cheaply fix)
> SERGEY FEDOROV
> Director of Engineering
> [email protected]
> 121 Albright Way | Los Gatos, CA 95032
Very happy that you are looped in here.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
