On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 6:42 PM Dave Täht via Starlink <starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > We had a ton of email bounce last week. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:21:55AM -0500, Nick Hall via Starlink wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've had a Starlink (the round version 1) for around a year and was > > thinking about bufferbloat yesterday and just found your mailing list. I > > just started looking at the archives but I'm gathering that you are looking > > for people to test things and am wondering what I can do to help? > > yes.
At the moment... I am mostly looking to get baseline tests from various vantage points, w/o sqm. Starlink throughput is varying wildly from multiple locations. The latency seems to vary as a function of a fixed length fifo. Increasingly seems to vary at peak hours. Running tests for 300 sec to be sure to see at least one sat change. Script: #!/bin/bash T=dishy-nick # a unique name for your site, + options like sqm on or off. # other servers are in ontario, de, atlanta, mumbai,london - if the lasers go up testing those become interesting # pick 2 close ones for S in fremont.starlink.taht.net dallas.starlink.taht.net do flent -t $T --step-size=.05 --socket-stats -l 300 -H $S rrul_be flent -t $T --step-size=.05 --socket-stats -l 300 -H $S rrul for i in 1 4 16 do flent -t $T-$i --step-size=.05 --socket-stats -l 300 --te=upload_streams=$i -H $S tcp_nup flent -t $T-$i --step-size=.05 --socket-stats -l 300 --te=download_streams=$i -H $S tcp_ndown done done # there's an interesting rtt_fair test here, keep these for a baseline worlwide measurement flent -x --socket-stats --step-size=.05 -H de.starlink.taht.net -H london.starlink.taht.net -H singapore.starlink.taht.net -H fremont.starlink.taht.net -t $T rtt_fair4be > > I have used flent a little before, and only know the basics, but I can run > > tests if you give me direction for what you need. > > > > I am not using the provided Starlink router but instead the dish is > > connected directly to my EdgeRouter X which is running the 1.10 series > > EdgeRouter firmware with Cake from > > https://community.ui.com/questions/Cake-compiled-for-the-EdgeRouter-devices/fc1ff27c-f321-4344-8737-fcc755cae8a2 > > > > I see a link to running CAKE with adaptive bandwidth: > > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/cake-w-adaptive-bandwidth/108848 > > > > But this is running OpenWrt. I know OpenWrt can run on the EdgeRouter X but > > I can't spend the level of time to flash the router that it would probably > > need right now. Do you know if that script would be able to run on the > > version of Cake that I currently have running on the EdgeRouter X? Or have > > necessary improvements been made to Cake that my version wouldn't have? > > So far as I know the edgerouter version of cake is pretty current. > > the script requires some things about timings that egerouter > may not have. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlink mailing list > > starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > -- > Fixing the Internet on a too-tight budget: https://patreon.com/dtaht > Dave Taht, Chief bottlewasher, TekLibre > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink -- FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake