Thanks Jonathan! Curious and curiouser
I'd love to understand the difference between the tests I've been doing and your tests. - How many TCP flows did you have please ( cake performance seems to drop significantly with increased number of TCP flows, although I need to do more testing to understand why )? - What was the RTT? - Load tool? - ... so many questions :) On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18 Sep, 2023, at 10:50 pm, dave seddon via Cake < > cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > The cake tests so far had rtt 1ms and rtt 3ms, which might be too low. > ( If it is too low, then maybe it would make sense to remove "rtt lan = rtt > 1ms" option, as it's a misleading configuration option? ) > > If all your traffic is over the LAN, and you have a machine and > application tuned for the extra-low latencies that a LAN can offer, then > setting LAN-grade targets for Cake might make sense. But most people's > traffic is a mixture, with the performance of Internet traffic being more > important, and that is better served by the *default* settings. > > You ran fq_codel at its default settings. These are equivalent to Cake's > default settings, so far as the AQM activity is concerned. I'm just asking > for a like-to-like comparison. You could be pleasantly surprised. > > - Jonathan Morton -- Regards, Dave Seddon +1 415 857 5102
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake