Hi Michael,
--On April 7, 2008 9:38:30 PM +0200 Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I small question. ICalender server announces support for LOCK and
UNLOCK but requesting even a simple lock like this:
<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\" ?>
<D:lockinfo xmlns:D=\"DAV:\">
<D:lockscope><D:exclusive/></D:lockscope>
<D:locktype><D:write/></D:locktype>
</D:lockinfo>
Gives this response:
<html>
<head>
<title>501 Not Implemented</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Not Implemented</h1>
Some functionality requested is not implemented on this server.
</body>
</html>
Anything wrong with the lock request?
No. We are being naughty in advertising support for LOCK when we don't
actually implement it. I think that was done because there was some dav
client that would not work properly without LOCK being advertised even
though it did not use LOCK.
We do have a ticket open to support LOCK. However, its not a big priority
item as it does not seem like many clients to date have tried to make use
of it (though of course that could be because its not supported - however
I've not heard from client developers who expressed an interest in wanting
it).
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
calendarserver-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/calendarserver-dev
