On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:50 PM, Mark Cockfield wrote:
Finally, I would be interested in hearing what Wilfredo's and David's
motivation was in creating their respective tickets regarding data
persistence.
I added couple of comments to http://trac.calendarserver.org/ticket/198
.
Atomicity is my greatest concern at the moment.
http://trac.calendarserver.org/ticket/269 is important regardless
of whether we use a DB or not. We have some administrative functions
that we'd like to be able to implement without running a server or
instantiating HTTP resources and doing HTTP things to them. The data
model and protocol are inter-twined right now, and that's just poor
abstraction.
-wsv
_______________________________________________
calendarserver-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-dev
