Hi,
On 15.05.2009, at 23:08, Markus Stürmer wrote:
Both parties had good arguments there, I think.
well, I have not heard any good (actually none at all) arguments pro-
UUID, contra X-UUID yet.
Why changing a standard-compliant implementation, only because
others don't implement it correctly? Why porting software to Linux
and insisting on a certain approach when there is no client
supporting it?
Apple does not port the software to Linux :-)
CalDAV may just be too complicated…
No. CalDAV does not enforce uuid's. Thats a very special thing of the
Apple server. Both, server and client need to deal with any iCal
ATTENDEE ID. Can be UUID, mailto, tel, anything.
iMiP seems to work fine in both, iCal and Lightning. Is there a way
of doing that?
Unfortunately I also don't expect sunbird/lighning to support DCS's
urn schemes soon. It is just not common enough, and they are already
short on developers. :-(
As of now, there is no way to resolve UUID ATTENDEEs. Its plain
impossible for a client to remap incoming iMIP messages (a UUID is
completely opaque to the client).
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://helgehess.eu/
_______________________________________________
calendarserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-users
