On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:

> 
> Le 2013-03-21 à 11:38, Andre LaBranche <d...@apple.com> a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 2013-03-21 à 11:14, Marko Bauhardt <m...@datameer.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Hi Morgen
>>>> 
>>>>> The entry without a username is normal and is because the request wasn't 
>>>>> authenticated (note the 401 HTTP response status).  In response to a 401 
>>>>> the user-agent will repeat the request with credentials included and you 
>>>>> should then get a 20X response and an access.log entry with the 
>>>>> authenticated username.
>>>> 
>>>> unauthenticated requests means at least one client which is not logged in 
>>>> tries to connect to our calendar?
>>> 
>>> It is normal… Especially by the fact that iCal Server don't support Basic 
>>> auth,
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just a minor comment here; we do support Basic (Authentication --> Basic --> 
>> Enabled == True), but its use is discouraged for security reasons. It's only 
>> reasonably safe to use Basic over SSL. As of r10129 (in trunk, and going 
>> forward) we disallow use of Basic (even if it's enabled) unless the client 
>> is connecting over SSL. If you really want Basic over non-SSL, you have to 
>> set Authentication --> Basic --> AllowedOverWireUnencrypted == True.
> 
> Ah, I didn't know Basic worked with iCal Server (not Calendar Server), I 
> thought only Digest and Kerberos was supported.

It's probably true that only Digest and Kerberos are supported in OS X Server / 
iCal Server :) There is always a gap between "works" and "supported". Mind that 
gap :)

-dre

> 
>> -dre
>> 
>>> so the client must do at least one non-auth request to do the Digest 
>>> workflow. This is just like a browser would do.
>>> 
>>>> so we have to figure out which client is making so many requests to our 
>>>> calendar installation.
>>>> 
>>>> we found also in our logs user names in a UUID style, e.g.: 1234-4321-abcd
>>>> Any idea who is sending those usernames?
>>> 
>>> It's iCal itself who use this, and it's perfectly good. Resources in iCal 
>>> Server are accessible by both the username or the UUID. It's not a problem.
>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Marko
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> calendarserver-users mailing list
>>>> calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org
>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/calendarserver-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> calendarserver-users mailing list
>>> calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/calendarserver-users

_______________________________________________
calendarserver-users mailing list
calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/calendarserver-users

Reply via email to