yeh punt it
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > yank it! > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Simon MacDonald > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The Android Apache 2.0 license can be removed from the contact code. >> The original code for this came from an example off the Android site >> that Fil had in his repo. Since them we've dropped support for older >> Android versions and we've removed the code that needed the license. I >> had a fork that removed it under phonegap-android but it never got >> applied. >> >> I'd say to yank the Crypto stuff as well. >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey >>> >>> I'm currently working on CB-3 in JIRA, and I noticed that the Contacts >>> Class that we're using has the Android Apache 2.0 Licence notice on >>> it. Is this a derived work, and if so, how much code is left and do >>> we have to have this licence and copyright notice on it? Can someone >>> look into this? >>> >>> Also, there is the old Crypto class that I threw in there back in the >>> old hack days that is from Android Snippets. While the site says that >>> we can use it for whatever we want without worrying about copyright, I >>> can't see their TOS and I would rather remove the Crypto classes from >>> Callback. I don't think that anyone is using them, since we didn't >>> document them, and they aren't very well thought out. Is it cool to >>> yank it out? >>> >>> Joe >>> >> >
