we need to be consistent on tag naming when we automate release building
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > Windows Phone has been tagged > https://github.com/callback/callback-windows-phone/tags > However, It is tagged 1.3.rc1 > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> + ... 1 ? >> >> On 11-12-01 1:11 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Do we need to vote on this? Sorry couldn't resist. >> > >> >Simon Mac Donald >> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Michael Brooks >> ><[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Simon - I agree. I really like a release schedule that uses release >> >> candidates and reserves a few days for solid testing. I appreciate you >> >> suggesting it for 1.3.0! >> >> >> >> Ken - There's a JIRA and GitHub ticket for the issue, so we can move the >> >> conversation there. I could use some help testing it once the patch is >> >>in >> >> place. >> >> >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Simon MacDonald >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >> > I have no problem with the change of tag name or you getting code into >> >> the >> >> > release by the 12th. I'm just thinking we need to leave a few days >> >>13-15 >> >> to >> >> > do some testing and make sure we haven't broken anything. >> >> > >> >> > Simon Mac Donald >> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Michael Brooks >> >><[email protected] >> >> > >wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > I like it Simon. >> >> > > >> >> > > I'd suggest tagging as "1.3.0rc1" instead of "1.3.0_rc1" >> >> > > >> >> > > I would like to squeak in OS X support for BlackBerry. Should I have >> >> this >> >> > > completed by Monday December 5th or Monday December 12th? >> >> > > >> >> > > Michael >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Simon MacDonald >> >> > > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > Hey all, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > For the upcoming 1.3 release can we throw down a few dates? Our >> >>last >> >> > > > release, 1.2, was tagged and released the same day. I can't say >> >>for >> >> > > certain >> >> > > > but I'm guessing the rush was to get it out before the Adobe >> >> > announcement >> >> > > > but we are lucky we didn't have major problems with that release >> >>as >> >> we >> >> > > were >> >> > > > a bit light on end to end testing. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Since we are thinking about releasing 1.3 on December 16th I >> >>thought >> >> > I'd >> >> > > > work back a bit to identify some milestones. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Dec 5th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc1 >> >> > > > Dec 12th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc2 and implement a code freeze >> >> > > > Dec 13th - Dec 14th - testing, testing, testing >> >> > > > Dec 15th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0 >> >> > > > Dec 16th - package and release PhoneGap 1.3 >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Basically we shouldn't be adding new code the week of the 12th >> >>unless >> >> > we >> >> > > > have broken something that we discover doing regression testing. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > These are only suggestions folks but what do you think about a >> >>little >> >> > > more >> >> > > > process this time around? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Simon Mac Donald >> >> > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
