Looks rad. I'm curious what an AMD plugin vs the same plugin authored in CJS style would look like. Just a hello world.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Gord Tanner <[email protected]> wrote: > So I ported callback-js to use almond but it is still using the custom > builder code. > > https://github.com/gtanner/callback-js/tree/almond > > It was very nice that I could switch this out with no update to any of the > modules. > > Patrick: Would be cool if you could update this to use r.js if it is > possible. > > With my quick experience with almond I have to say I really like what I am > seeing and I think it will help us out a lot and give the ability to have > plugin's authored in both commonJS and AMD module definitions. (unless I am > misunderstanding something). > > Gord > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:20, Gord Tanner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I am switching out browser-require for require.js in a branch today to >> see >> > what this would feel like for a developer. >> > >> >> > I have no preference as to which module system we use so I am going to >> give >> > this a go today to learn AMD modules / requireJS and get a feel for how >> it >> > would look in phonegap.js development. >> > >> >> I assume you are going to use the big requirejs, which includes dynamically >> loading modules async, etc. Since I've been playing with almond, I can >> take whatever you do, and see how to fit almond into the picture for a >> single cat'd file. Just point me to your repo ... >> >> -- >> Patrick Mueller >> http://muellerware.org >> > > > > -- > Gord Tanner > Senior Developer / Code Poet > tinyHippos Inc. > @tinyhippos
