Us IBM'ers had to do both the CCLA (already on file with Apache) and then submit ICLA's for working on Cordova.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Ken Wallis <[email protected]> wrote: > Many companies (cough, eg. Rim) include in their employment contract that all > work done by an employee, unless specifically excluded, is owned by the > company. In those scenarios, the individual usually can't sign an ICLA as it > is not applicable. This is often a point of contention in many open source > projects. It would be good to clarify the Apache stance, as for example, > Gord and I have NOT signed/submitted ICLA's. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Filip Maj [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 07:35 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Callback CCLA questions > > >>Two questions: >> >>1. If a contributor's corporation has submitted a CCLA, does the >>contributor have to sign an iCLA? (my hunch is no) > > Pretty sure it's a YES - just like us, we had to submit both. > >>2. How do I verify that a corporation has submitted their CCLA so I >>can merge in a patch? > > There was a link floating around somewhere earlier... Check the mailing > list archives? > >> >>For reference, see: >>https://github.com/callback/callback-ios/pull/36 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your > system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
