On 17 December 2011 18:48, Michael Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you please briefly explain our stance on signing the Apache CLA for > contributions to Callback-Docs?
Documentation that is delivered from ASF hardware and/or as part of a release is treated the same way as code. What this means is that significant contributions will require an iCLA. The exception to this is documentation that is publicly editable such as a wiki. However, such documentation cannot be a part of a release. > The documentation is a set of markdown files. Some contributions are minor > edits for accuracy, while other contributions will translate the English > documentation to another language (extremely large commit that touches or > creates many files). With respect to translations see the access levels defined for (our brand spanking new) Pootle server: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/translate+pootle+service+auth+levels Ross -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
