Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Patrick Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been prepping weinre for build/release-ability, and have a NOTICE file > with 3rd party code that I use. Could someone familiar with NOTICE files > give me a quick review, before I push to Apache?
Looks good for a LICENSE file. The NOTICE file is for "required third-party notices" that are pretty rare in practice [1]. So I'd just include the following default content in the NOTICE file: <NOTICE> Apache Cordova weinre Copyright 2012 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). </NOTICE> ... and put the parts about included software into the LICENSE file, after the ALv2 text. PS1. Other products from within the ASF don't need to be explicitly mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE (the default text covers everything developed within the ASF), except possibly for parts where they contain extra third party code that needs to be mentioned. PS2. As long as coffee-script is not included in the source or binary packages, there's no need to mention it either in NOTICE or LICENSE. PS3. I notice the reference to UnixCrypt. Can you check whether it falls within the requirements of the export control laws as described in http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html? [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices BR, Jukka Zitting
