Ahh I see the issue. Moving forward I won't do that I guess... We are just in a time crunch and I needed to move on to a different implementation and wanted someone else familiar with Android to check out my patch, test, etc. while I went and worked on other stuff.
On 12-02-17 3:42 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> Was keeping it on a branch until it was ready for primetime and others >>had >> tested it a little bit more. > >You can have branches also on git-wip-us. > >The reason I'm bringing this up is that if you don't push your changes >to the git-wip-us repository yourself, the primary legal audit trail >of who contributed this piece of code will point to someone else (in >this case Bryce). You're essentially asking that someone to take >responsibility of the changes you made. Did you really intend these >changes to be contributed to Apache? Where's the record saying that >you did? Sure did, see: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-callback-dev/201202.mbox /%3CCB63EF37.5396%25fil%40adobe.com%3E > >In normal circumstances this is hardly an issue, but if something goes >wrong (say for example you were experimenting with some patented Adobe >technology with no intention of open-sourcing it, and someone else >pushed those changes to Apache without realizing what you were doing) >then such blurring of legal responsibility can quickly become nasty. > >BR, > >Jukka Zitting
