> It just doesn't jive with the story I think you're telling with your list, > at least the first two points. There is at least *implied* support for 3rd > party plugins today.
*sigh* It may, or may not, surprise you to learn that I have little to no say in Adobe's evang team activities. Though I can assure you its not the first time I've been embarrassed by them! =) Saying that, I'm obv happy too they are doing this. The more support we get the better. Now that said, I don't count that as documentation for Apache Cordova (nor do I think you or anyone here does). If it isn't in http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf then does it matter? Just shipping the code in itself implies some level of support I suppose. What are we looking for as a resolution here? Commit that 1.7 we document the plugin api?
